| LMUP Versions |
|
Licence and permissions In the spirit of open-access, the LMUP is free to use (there is no licence agreement and no registration or permission is required) but we ask that you cite the main paper of the development and evaluation study (Barrett et al. 2004) and any other appropriate methodological LMUP papers (e.g. evaluations of the LMUP in whatever appropriate context). It is important to ensure the LMUP used is valid.
We are exploring further updates to the LMUP in the UK. If you would like to know more, please contact us.
Other evaluated versions of the LMUP
Translations under evaluation and/or unpublished
Modes of administration Some of the above translations have also changed mode of administration, usually because of levels of literacy in the target population. One study, the Contessa Study in the UK, has carried out a telephone interviewer-administered (or CATI) version of the LMUP. This version of the LMUP has not been evaluated. Further information can be found in NatCen’s technical report from page 50 (Contessa Technical Report) |
Karla Flores and Prof Luciana Ramos Lira (Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatria)
and Zenaida Martinez and Prof Roger Rochat (Emory University)
are evaluating the LMUP in various translations within Mexico.
Meagan Chuey and Dr Lisa Kane Low (University of Michigan) are evaluating the LMUP in Arabic with Syrian refugees in the U.S.
Dr Diane Morof and colleagues (CDC) are evaluating the LMUP
in Swahili translation as part of a project to reduce maternal deaths in Tanzania.
Dr Alan Charissou, Ms Chloe Johnson,
Dr Jenny Hall, and Dr Geraldine Barrett are evaluating the LMUP in France.